Legal Opinion

Village of Wayne v. Goldsmith

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1905No. Docket No. 182Published

Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Assumpsit in justice’s court by the village of Wayne against Earl Goldsmith for the taxes of 1903. Plaintiff had judgment, and defendant removed the case to the circuit court by writ of certiorari. The judgment was affirmed at the circuit, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

This is an action of assumpsit for the recovery of certain personal taxes assessed by the plaintiff against the defendant. The suit was brought by William H. Brewer, who claimed to be the village treasurer, in the name of the municipality, before a justice of the peace of said village. Plaintiff declared orally and filed a bill of particulars as follows:

“ 1903, June 15th. To personal taxes assessed by and in favor of the plaintiff, the village of "W ayne, and against the defendant, Earl Goldsmith___ $14 00

1903, July 25th. To collect fee of 4% on same.. 56

“Total..........................-.....$…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Village of Chelsea v. HolmesMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API