Legal Opinion

Goldstein v. Wolkenberg

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 15, 1907Published

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, fifth district, borough of Manhattan, rendered in favor of the plaintiff.

1Per curiam

According to respondent’s own statement, “ the defendant was the owner of a building in the course of erection at Nos. 712, 714 East Sixth street, in the borough of Manhattan, city of New York. The defendant executed a contract with one Miceli & Company, under which contract the said Miceli & Company was to do all the mason work in the said building, and the said Miceli & Company made a contract with the Stanley Hod Elevator Company, wherein the said elevator company agreed to supply a ‘ Hod ’ elevator machine for use in said building. This machine was stationed in front of the said building,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Robbins v. Chicago CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Maltbie v. BoltingThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API