Martin v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
MANN, Judge.
The State has moved to strike the appellant’s “point on appeal” on the ground that the appellant did not file a timely mo*721tion for new trial and the sole point on appeal involves the sufficiency of evidence. Fla.R.Cr.P. 1.590, 33 F.S.A., provides that a motion for new trial must be made within a period not exceeding 15 days “after the rendition of the verdict or the finding of the court.” Martin was convicted by verdict of a jury rendered September 28, 1971. His motion for new trial was filed December 6, 1971 — three days after the adjudication of guilt. The motion was not timely…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Douglas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- State v. WrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- State v. OwensSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
- Baxley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Everett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
- Fuller v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981