Legal Opinion

Martin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 24, 1972No. 72-13PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANN, Judge.

The State has moved to strike the appellant’s “point on appeal” on the ground that the appellant did not file a timely mo*721tion for new trial and the sole point on appeal involves the sufficiency of evidence. Fla.R.Cr.P. 1.590, 33 F.S.A., provides that a motion for new trial must be made within a period not exceeding 15 days “after the rendition of the verdict or the finding of the court.” Martin was convicted by verdict of a jury rendered September 28, 1971. His motion for new trial was filed December 6, 1971 — three days after the adjudication of guilt. The motion was not timely…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Douglas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  2. State v. WrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
  3. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  4. State v. OwensSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  5. Baxley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Everett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  2. Fuller v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API