Legal Opinion

Hood v. Will Transport

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 7, 2005No. 40,168-WCWPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDrew, J.

hAt issue is whether the employer’s re-conventional demand stated a cause of action to recover worker’s compensation benefits paid to an employee who tested positive for drugs at the time of the truck crash. La. R.S. 23:1081(l)(b). The worker’s compensation judge (WCJ) overruled the claimant’s exception of no cause of action after which the claimant filed an application for supervisory review. This court granted claimant’s writ application and ordered this matter be docketed for a decision. For the following reasons, we find that the WCJ properly rejected claimant’s exception of no cause of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. OUR LADY LAKE REG. MED. CENTER v. HelmsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
  2. Johnson v. State Through Div. of Admin.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. Yarnell Ice Cream Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
  4. Yarnell Ice Cream Co. v. AllenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. Goodman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rangel v. DennyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Cordon v. Parish Glass of St. Tammany, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Sarah Eilts v. Twentieth Century Fox TV and Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API