Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Bristol West Insurance Co. v. MD Readers, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 15, 2010No. 4D10-524Published

1ConcurrenceWarner, J.

While I concuV in the majority opinion, I do so only because the issue of the propriety of the declaratory judgment is not before us for consideration. I cannot understand why this action is even proceeding where appellee is not seeking any benefits — damages—from its claim. Bristol has already admitted that it made an arithmetical mistake and agrees that MD Read*52ers’ calculation of reimbursement rates by CPT codes is correct. Assuming MD Readers gets the declaration that it wants, the court will declare the CPT code reimbursement rates for 2004-2005.

However, not one member of the class can…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Menendez v. Progressive Express Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2010
  2. Shenandoah Chiropractic v. National Specialty InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2007
  3. Altamonte Springs Imaging, L.C. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API