Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Canaday v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1984No. 83-241, 83-242PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*898CARDINE, Justice.

Appellants Canaday and Manning were tried and convicted of misdemeanor charges in justice of the peace court and appealed from their respective convictions. Both defendants were represented by counsel. District court, on appeal, after hearing arguments and reviewing a transcript of the proceedings, affirmed the convictions.

Appellants present a single issue for review:

“Whether a trial before a non-lawyer justice of the peace denies a defendant his constitutionally-guaranteed right to.due process of law.”

Appellants are not alleging that specific errors occurred during the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Ward v. Village of MonroevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. North v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Ex Parte RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Amrein v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State Ex Rel. Collins v. BedellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Walton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  4. State v. DavisMontana Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API