Legal Opinion

United States v. Johnson

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided August 14, 1935No. 837PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FRANKLIN E. KENNAMER, District Judge.

The purpose of this action is the establishment of priority of a debt alleged to be due the United States, and the enjoining of the disbursing of funds of a failed bank to other creditors. The amended complaint is referred to in a memorandum filed in this case, and reported in United States v. Barnett (D. C.) 7 F. Supp. 573.

The facts are that a full-blood Osage allottee, Esther Berry Smith, died intestate, leaving funds to her credit in the Osage Indian Agency, in the amount of $117,804.-98, which sum was paid to S. S. Mathis, the duly appointed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bramwell v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Work v. United States Ex Rel. LynnSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. United States v. HughesDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Barnett v. American Surety Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
  5. United States v. BarnettDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1934

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API