United States v. Johnson
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
FRANKLIN E. KENNAMER, District Judge.
The purpose of this action is the establishment of priority of a debt alleged to be due the United States, and the enjoining of the disbursing of funds of a failed bank to other creditors. The amended complaint is referred to in a memorandum filed in this case, and reported in United States v. Barnett (D. C.) 7 F. Supp. 573.
The facts are that a full-blood Osage allottee, Esther Berry Smith, died intestate, leaving funds to her credit in the Osage Indian Agency, in the amount of $117,804.-98, which sum was paid to S. S. Mathis, the duly appointed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bramwell v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Work v. United States Ex Rel. LynnSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- United States v. HughesDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1934
- Barnett v. American Surety Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
- United States v. BarnettDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1934
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936