Legal Opinion

McIntire v. Gray

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 23, 1979No. 96-307, CA 11453PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

pro tempore.

Plaintiff was injured as a result of defendant’s negligent operation of his automobile. Plaintiff’s insurer paid plaintiff’s medical expenses and reimbursed her for lost wages under coverage required by ORS 743.800-.835 (PIP benefits). Plaintiffs insurer was reimbursed for some of these payments by defendant’s insurer pursuant to ORS 743.825. Plaintiff then filed this personal injury action against defendant.

In her original complaint, plaintiff sought both general damages and special damages for lost wages and medical expenses. On the morning of trial, plaintiff withdrew her…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Parrott v. HansonOregon Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Michael Ganley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API