Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Lovejoy

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1977No. 13580PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Haswell

Plaintiffs Kelly brought this action in the district court, Yellowstone County, seeking enforcement of a restrictive covenant by enjoining defendants Lovejoy from maintaining two horses on their property. The court enjoined the Lovejoys who now appeal that order. We reverse.

At the time this action was commenced both plaintiffs and defendants resided in a subdivision located a short distance outside the western city limits of Billings, Montana. The subdivision is located in an area that is primarily residential on the eastern portion located nearest to the city of Billings, but development…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kosel v. StoneMontana Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Mundt v. MallonMontana Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Farmers Elevator Co. of Reserve v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Higdem v. WhithamMontana Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Northwestern Fire & Marine Insurance v. PollardMontana Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Tynes v. Bankers Life Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1986
  2. McGregor v. MommerMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Hart Engineering Co. v. FMC Corp.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1984
  4. Rase v. Castle Mountain Ranch, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Montana Bank of Circle, N.A. v. Ralph Meyers & Son, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1989

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API