Legal Opinion

Hartfield and Richardson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 10, 1926No. 9806PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

BERRY, Judge.

The appellants were convicted of theft of a watch under the value of §50.00 and their punishment assessed at a fine of §100.00 and six months in jail.

The record discloses that one Alford Mattke and wife left home on the afternoon of May 29, 1925, a short time before sundown and went to the home of Mr. Doege, Mattke’s father-in-law, who lived .about a mile away, and that when they returned home that night they found that someone had entered the house, the doors of which had been left open, and had taken a watch and some meat and apples. The only connection this record shows that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tollett v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Schneider-Davis Co. v. HartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
  3. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  2. Compton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942
  3. Curtis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API