Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Sharrock

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided May 20, 1991No. 64,891; ACM 27897Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partEverett, Senior Judge

The Manual for Courts-Martial describes the circumstances under which a commanding officer may order a servieemember into pretrial confinement. RCM 305, Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1984. Under this rule, which “was developed from the premise that no person should be confined unnecessarily and attempts to strike a balance between individual liberty and the protection of society,” 1 a service-member may not be ordered into confinement unless “there is a reasonable belief that: (1) [a]n offense triable by court-martial has been committed; (2) [t]he person confined committed it; and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Illinois v. LafayetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. EzellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  4. United States v. StuckeyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  5. United States v. KalscheuerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API