Legal Opinion

State v. Murphy

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1998No. S-97-1237PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.

The appellant, Kevin J. Murphy, was charged with several felonies. He then filed, inter alia, a motion with the trial court to take depositions, which motion was sustained. He later filed a motion for discharge, claiming that his statutory right to a speedy trial had been violated. The State opposed Murphy’s motion to discharge, claiming that the period of time from the trial court’s ruling on Murphy’s motion for depositions until those depositions were concluded was excludable pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1207(4) (Reissue 1995). The trial court found that said period was excludable under…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. CraigNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. AlvarezNebraska Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State v. TurnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. LaflerNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. BrownNebraska Supreme Court · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. FeldhackerNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. WardNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. FeldhackerNebraska Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. State v. HayesNebraska Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. State v. RecekNebraska Supreme Court · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API