Legal Opinion

People v. Seychel

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 1987PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Leslie Crocker Snyder, J.

The defendant was indicted for criminal possession of a controlled substance and related offenses after a search of the defendant’s apartment, pursuant to a warrant, allegedly un*311covered a large quantity of narcotics. The People have refused to disclose the search warrant affidavit and have petitioned the court under CPL 240.50 for a protective order. This section specifically empowers the court to limit discovery to protect the confidentiality of informants.1

At issue in this case is whether a search warrant affidavit reciting facts in such detail…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. CastilloNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Torres v. IrvinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  3. In re Grand Jury Subpoena of StewartNew York Supreme Court · 1989
  4. People v. TorresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. People v. CastilloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API