Legal Opinion

Ross v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 4, 1986No. 72261PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sognier, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of armed robbery. In his sole enumeration of error appellant contends the trial court erred by not permitting him to testify that he was under the influence of PCP (a drug), and thus, unable to possess sufficient mental capacity to form a criminal intent.

At a Jackson-Denno hearing on the voluntariness of appellant’s confession, appellant testified that while he was in jail after his arrest, his co-accused told appellant that he (the co-accused) had put PCP in appellant’s drink, without appellant’s knowledge, prior to the robbery. The trial court ruled…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Momon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  2. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  3. Glover v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harrison v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  2. Gordon County Farm v. MaloneyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  3. Buttles v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  4. Gordon County Farm v. MaloneyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API