Legal Opinion

Confederated Bands of Ute Indians v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 6, 1951No. Nos. 45585, 46640, 47564 and 47566PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*681OPINION

Per curiam::

We have fully described in our findings the services rendered in this case by the attorney of record and his associates. We will not paraphrase that description here. We think the services were excellent, and can see no instance in which we think the interests of the plaintiff bands of Indians could have been better served. We have, however, awarded somewhat smaller fees than the maximum permitted by the statute, for three reasons. First, the total amount of the four judgments, almost $32,000,000, is so large that an attorney’s fee of ten percent based on that figure shocks…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. The Cherokee Nation, and Its Attorneys, Paul M. Niebell, Earl Boyd Pierce, George E. Norvell, and Dennis W. Bushyhead v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  2. Sioux Nation of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  3. Western Shoshone Identifiable Group ex rel. Temoak Bands of Western Shoshone Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  4. Brough v. AppaworaUtah Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Brough v. AppaworaUtah Supreme Court · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API