Legal Opinion

Tysen v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action to cancel ancient tax entry as cloud on title.

1Opinion of the CourtDike, J.

The action is in equity, seeking cancellation of an ancient tax entry as a cloud on title. In the years 1860, 1868 and 1869 the estate of Commodore De Kay owned a tract of land near the center of Richmond county. This tract consisted of some forty-eight acres and by mesne conveyances has passed into the possession of the plaintiffs. In the years 1860, 1868, 1869 and 1872 the tax officials of Richmond county assessed against the said forty-eight-acre tract certain taxes, which were indicated on the assessment roll of said Richmond county, town of Middle-town, as being assessed against the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Holland v. ChallenSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Sharon v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Jex v. Mayor, Aldermen & CommonaltyNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  4. Elmhurst Fire Co. v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Webster Apartments v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. County of Westchester v. Town of HarrisonNew York Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Tysen v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API