Legal Opinion

Ruth D. Corley v. Life and Casualty Insurance Company of Tennessee, a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 2, 1961No. 16270_1PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

..... ,, , ,TT _ „„ „ T 1 WILBUR K. MILLER, Chief Judge.

Ruth Corley and her husband sued John E. Lockhart and Life and Casualty Insurance Company, his employer, to recover for personal injuries and property damage sustained when Lockhart’s automobile collided with the Corley car on Friday, March 15, 1957, at the intersection of 7th and L Streets, S. E., in the District of Columbia.

On the theory that Lockhart was not acting within the scope of his employment, the company moved for summary judgment. After considering depositions and affidavits, the trial court made findings of fact that at the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. KLM Royal Dutch Airlines Holland v. TullerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
  2. Murphy Auto Parts Co. v. Ball ex rel. BallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  3. Murphy Auto Parts Company, Inc. v. Thomas Charles Ball, Through His Next Friend, Rita H. Ball, Murphy Auto Parts Company, Inc. v. George J. Ball, Sr., and Rita H. BallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Burch v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2006
  2. Maiorana v. MacDonaldCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
  3. United States v. PriceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1983
  4. Meadows v. Grant's Auto Brokers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Conley v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API