Legal Opinion

In re Shane T.

New York City Family Court

Decided August 12, 1982PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Daniel D. Leddy, Jr., J.

Today, this court finds that 14-year-old Shane T. is an abused child in that he has been repeatedly called a “fag”, “faggot”, and “queer” by his natural father, a respondent herein. His father also taunted him continually by saying that hé should have been a girl. In holding that Shane is an abused child, the court concludes that the phrase “physical injury” as contemplated by section 1012 (subd [e], par [i]) of the Family Court Act need not be inflicted by physical force and that it encompasses the stomach pain experienced by Shane when his father…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Bennett v. JeffreysNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. In re Philip A.New York Court of Appeals · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re Katherine C.New York Family Court · 1984
  2. Wu v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  3. In re Roy T.New York City Family Court · 1984
  4. In re Bruce L.New York City Family Court · 1988
  5. In re Shanaye C.New York City Family Court · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API