Legal Opinion
Landmark Savings Bank v. Greenwald
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 19, 1991No. 22443-CAPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HIGHTOWER, Judge.
In a legal malpractice action, plaintiff appeals from a judgment sustaining an exception of prescription. For reasons expressed herein, we affirm.
*945FACTS
In conjunction with obtaining a second mortgage on certain real estate as loan security, Dixie Federal Savings and Loan Association, plaintiffs predecessor institution, employed the services of an attorney, Joseph W. Greenwald, to prepare a title opinion. Mr. Greenwald, in turn, procured another lawyer, Robert McKenzie, to examine the public records and report his findings in writing.
Dixie ultimately received a title opinion…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Canter v. Koehring CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
- Rayne State Bank & Trust Co. v. Nat. Union Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
- Braud v. New England Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
- Cherokee Restaurant, Inc. v. PiersonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ledbetter v. WheelerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
- Reeder v. NorthLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
- Landmark Sav. Bank v. GreenwaldLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991