Legal Opinion

Nova Services, Inc. v. VILLAGE OF SAUKVILLE

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided May 7, 1997No. 96-2198PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

It is undisputed by the parties that a municipal attorney may not serve as an advocate in an adversarial administrative hearing and then as an advisor to the tribunal. The Village of Saukville contends, however, that its attorney did not act as a prosecutor, but "merely conducted the hearing and elicited information from the witnesses." After reviewing the record, we conclude that the village attorney acted as both prosecutor in this adversarial proceeding and as advisor in a closed session to the village board. Because due process was violated, we reverse and remand with directions that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Ball v. McPheeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Marris v. City of CedarburgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Stacy v. Ashland County Department of Public WelfareWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Metropolitan Holding Co. v. Board of ReviewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Guthrie v. Wisconsin Employment Relations CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Davenport Pastures, LP v. Morris County Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  2. Thorp v. Town of LebanonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
  3. Davenport Pastures, LP v. Morris County Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API