Legal Opinion

Aultman Engine & Thresher Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 7, 1909PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Linn District Court. — Hon. Milo P. Smith, Judge. Action for damages resulted in judgment-as prayed. The defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

The petition alleged: That the Cedar Rapids Supply Company delivered to the defendant at Des Moines, .Iowa, on June 11, 1903, a threshing machine feeder to be transported to Blackwell, Okl.; that defendant accepted the same and undertook its carriage as stated, receiving $4.16 as compensation; that defendant failed to carry said feeder within a reasonable time and neglected to deliver the same at Blackwell; that-the reasonable value of the feeder was $220; that the date of delivery to defendant was prior to the commencement of the threshing season; that plaintiff had bargained the feeder to a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mulligan v. Illinois Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1873
  2. Beard & Sons v. St. Louis, Alton & Terbe Haute Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  3. Clark v. American Express Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  4. Nelson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  5. McLagan v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Crowley Bros. v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Cedar Rapids Fuel Co. v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API