Legal Opinion

Martinez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 25, 1990No. 89-3009PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We reverse and vacate that part of the trial court’s sentence which imposed a three-year mandatory minimum sentence for the defendant’s conviction of third-de*271gree murder. The use of a firearm is not an essential element of third-degree murder and the jury did not, by interrogatory verdict, make a specific finding that appellant used a firearm in the commission of the murder. The state agrees that this part of the trial court’s sentence must be reversed on the authority of State v. Overfelt, 457 So.2d 1385 (Fla.1984) and Vause v. State, 502 So.2d 511 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).

We affirm appellant’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. OverfeltSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  2. Vause v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Letourneau v. LetourneauDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API