Legal Opinion

Lemley v. Pizzica

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Washington County

Decided July 21, 1964No. 486PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sweet, P. J.,

Lemley sued Pizzica in trespass claiming that defendant had blocked Dry Run in Monongahela in such a way that extensive flood damage to automobiles, personal property, land and buildings resulted. We have not come to the merits of this matter, which allegedly involved the creation of a valley type hole 25 feet deep and 150 feet wide and caused $39,366 of property damage, because of a procedural complication which must first be resolved. The land, the buildings and the automobiles apparently belonged to Lemley Motors Inc. which assigned its claim for a good and valuable…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tugboat Indian Co. v. A/S Ivarans RederiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Sensenig v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  3. Marsh v. Western New York & Pennsylvania Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  4. Patten v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859
  5. Sniderman v. NeroneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. TMJ Hawaii, Inc. v. Nippon Trust BankHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Advantage Environmental Consultants, LLC v. Ground Zero Field Services, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API