Legal Opinion

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Yonce

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 8, 1936No. 14354PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Fisi-iburnE.

This suit in equity arose out of the issuance of a bond by the plaintiff to the state highway department, as obligee, on September 30, 1932, in pursuance of Section 6004, Code of Laws 1932, which provides, in effect, that every highway patrolman shall file with the highway department a bond, subscribed by some duly licensed surety company, conditioned for the faithful performance of his duties, and for the prompt and proper accounting for all funds coming into his hands; and further conditioned to pay any judgment recovered…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dodd v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1856
  2. Sheldon v. Centre School DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1856
  3. Kinder v. Atlantic Coast Lumber Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brown v. National Surety Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
  2. Small v. National Surety Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
  3. Collins v. Collins Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API