Legal Opinion

Dilling v. Murray

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1855PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPEAL from the Wayne Court of Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtGookins, J.

This was a proceeding instituted by Murray against Pilling, in the Wayne Circuit Court, and trails*325ferred to the Common Pleas, the object of which was to enjoin Dilling from obstructing the flow of the water of a stream to the plaintiff’s mill, by the manner of erecting and maintaining a dam above it.

The complaint states that for fourteen years the plaintiff has been the owner of a mill and manufactory propelled by water on his own land; that in the spring of 1850 the defendant erected a dam across the stream above the plaintiff’s land, by which the water was diverted from its natural channel,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Palmer v. MulliganNew York Supreme Court · 1805

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bleakley v. BarclaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  2. Dumont v. KelloggMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Stanford v. FeltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. City of Richmond v. TestIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  5. Wiley v. PaveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API