Legal Opinion
Walters v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 14, 1902No. 216PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska.
1Opinion of the Court
.Per Curiam,
judgment affirmed, with costs, on the authority of St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Company v. James, 161 U. S. 545; Louisville &c. Railway Company v. Louisville Banking Company, 174 U. S. 552.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Louisville Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
3Cited by2 opinions
- Davis' Admr. v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
- Evansville & Henderson Traction Co. v. Henderson Bridge Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1905