Legal Opinion

Tarkington v. Beneficial Finance Co. of Port Arthur

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 14, 1974No. 7618PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIES, Chief Justice.

On July 9, 1971, plaintiff — appellant— brought suit against Sears, Roebuck and Company for harassment in attempting to collect a debt, alleging he suffered mental anguish and humiliation, and asking for damages. On September 15, 1972, by first amended petition, plaintiff made Beneficial Finance Company of Port Arthur defendant, dropping Sears. On December 22, 1972, by second amended petition, plaintiff joined as defendant, Jerry D. Wooten.

Trial was to a jury at the conclusion of which both defendants filed a motion for instructed verdict which was granted by the court,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Nichols v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Anderson v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Owen v. KingTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Colbert v. Dallas Joint Stock Land BankTexas Supreme Court · 1941

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schriewer v. LiedtkeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  2. Koch Oil Co. v. Anderson Producing, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1994
  3. Haddad v. BoonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. Tidwell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API