Legal Opinion

Landstrom Realty Corp. v. Lamborn

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided March 3, 1932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Judgment unanimously modified, upon the law, by reducing the amount thereof to the sum of eleven dollars, and as so modified affirmed, without costs to either party.

While the evidence warranted a finding that the witness Wasserstrom had power to deliver the stock to the defendants for Sale for his own account and, therefore, the plaintiff was not entitled to replevy the same, nevertheless since the action was for replevin the costs were limited by subdivision 11 of section 164 of the New York City Municipal Court Code, to the sum fixed by the plaintiff as the value of the chattel, namely,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Harris v. RogersNew York Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Santiago v. JohnsonCivil Court of the City of New York · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API