People v. Prue

—Judgment unanimously modified as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice and as modified affirmed in accordance with the following Memorandum: Defendant was convicted following a bench trial of endangering the welfare of a child (Penal Law § 260.10 [1]). We reject the contention of defendant that Penal Law § 260.10 (1) is unconstitutionally vague as applied to him (see, People v Bergerson, 17 NY2d 398, 403-404; People v Padmore, 221 AD2d 663, 664, Iv denied 87 NY2d 1023; see also, People v Bright, 71 NY2d 376).

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see,…