Escobar v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
SEARS, Chief Justice.
The appellant, Manuel Escobar, appeals from his convictions for the murder of Javier Olazaba; for the armed robbery of Olazaba, Francisco Trejo, and Jose Guardado; and for the possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony. On appeal, Escobar contends, among other things, that the trial court erred in permitting Trejo and Guardado to testify about their out-of-court and in-court identifications of Escobar. We conclude, however, that the trial court did not err in failing to suppress the identifications. Because the other issues raised by Escobar are either…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Watson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
- Woods v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
- Bell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Ruffin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
- Harvey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
- Gittens v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2020
- Adkins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
- Cunningham v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2018
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.