Legal Opinion

Denniston v. Snyder

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1916PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion by defendants to interplead creditors of their testator.

1Opinion of the CourtRodenbeck, J.

The defendants are not eutitled to interplead the creditors of their testator because they aré not subjected to any double hazard, loss or damage with respect to plaintiff’s claim. The defendants are trustees for the creditors and are bound to inter*45pose all valid defenses to plaintiff’s claim. Matter of Prince, 56 Misc. Rep. 222, 227. The recovery of a judgment in the action would merely establish the claim and would not give any priority over other claims of the same class. Matter of Nelson, 63 Misc. Rep. 627, 632. The recovery of a judgment would give the claim no greater force than if the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re WarrinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  2. In re Judicial Settlement in the Estate of PrinceNew York Surrogate's Court · 1907
  3. In re the Voluntary Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of NelsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1909

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of GellisNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API