Aguiar v. State

Appellant, Felix Aguiar, was convicted of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver, to-wit: over one hundred pounds of cannabis. There were eleven other co-defendants, however, this appeal concerns only Aguiar.

One of appellant’s points on appeal presents the question of whether the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion to suppress certain physical evidence seized at the time and place of arrest.

At the hearing on the motion to suppress, there was testimony introduced that tended to show that various law enforcement agencies received telephone calls saying that a…