Legal Opinion

Kubajak v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 2005No. 2003-SC-0974-WCPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

It is undisputed that the claimant suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder, that the condition is disabling, and that it is work-related. An Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) determined, however, that the condition was due to observing gruesome crime scenes. Therefore, it was not an “injury” as defined by KRS 342.0011(1) and was not compensable. See Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government v. West, 52 S.W.3d 564 (Ky.2001). Having determined that the evidence did not compel a finding that the condition resulted from a physically traumatic event, the Workers’ Compensation…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Special Fund v. FrancisKentucky Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Paramount Foods, Inc. v. BurkhardtKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Caudill v. Maloney's Discount StoresKentucky Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Roark v. Alva Coal CorporationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1963
  5. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government v. WestKentucky Supreme Court · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Richard E. Jacobs Group, Inc. v. WhiteKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Kenton County Sheriff's Department v. Miguel RodriguezKentucky Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Kentucky State Police v. McCrayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2013
  4. Kubajak v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County GovernmentKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Mandy Tripp v. Scott Emergency Commc'n and Iowa Municipalities Workers' Comp. Assoc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2022

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API