Dunkley Co. v. Central California Canneries Co.
District Court, N.D. California
In Equity. Suit by the Dunkley Company against the Centra5 California Canneries Company and others. On motion to reopen de cree.
1Opinion of the Court
VAN FLEET, District Judge.
The above-entitled cause and the seven similar causes by the same plaintiff, numbered in the margin,1 all involving the validity of the same letters patent, were heretofore tried together in this court in April, 1916, and on December 4, 1916,. in accordance with an oral opinion by the court, an interlocutory *1002decree was entered in each holding the patent valid and infringed and ordering an accounting. These decrees were thereafter in due course in all respects affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals (Central California Canneries Co. v. Dunkley, 247 Fed. 790, 159 C.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Deering v. Winona Harvester WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- In Re PottsSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- T. H. Symington Co. v. National Malleable Castings Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Dunn Wire-Cut Lug Brick Co. v. Toronto Fire Clay Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
- Wilson v. Union Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1920
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Central California Canneries Co. v. Dunkley Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922
- Carson v. American Smelting & Refining Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1923