Legal Opinion

Simitz v. Schaapveld

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 18, 1913Published

Appeal from Johnson District Court. — Hon. R. P. Howell, Judge. Plaintiff (appellee) appealed to the district court from a judgment and order of a justice of the peace discharging a garnishee. In the district court defendant (appellant) moved to dismiss the appeal, which motion was overruled, and she appeals from such ruling.

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

In one of appellant’s arguments lie says: “Appellant’s counsel entertain no snob, delusion as that the members of this court prefer their entertainment, whether mixed or unmixed with their judicial labors, in the form of little journeys outside the record; but, if a part of such journey, when detailed, arouses curiosity, the remainder should be disclosed in order to gratify the same. Therefore the facts needed to be substituted for the highly colored ramblings under appellee’s summary, in, order to render its title not inappropriate, are,” etc. He then proceeds to tell us all about it. As he…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. A. A. Doolittle & Co. v. PorterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  2. Hodge v. Ruggles & St. L., K. C. & N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1872
  3. National Bank v. ChaseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API