20th Century Insurance v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EPSTEIN, Acting P. J.
We granted an alternative writ of mandate in this case to decide a single issue: the validity of the policy of the Los Angeles Superior Court Appellate Department that the time to file a notice of appeal runs from the date the clerk mails a notice of ruling. We conclude the policy is invalid because it conflicts with California Rules of Court, rule 122, which governs the subject. Under that provision, the 30-day time period runs from a clerk’s notice of entry of an appealable order. Relying on its policy, the appellate department dismissed the petitioners’ appeal…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hollister Convalescent Hospital, Inc. v. RicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Reygoza v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Hughey v. City of HaywardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- People v. Wilshire Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
3Cited by10 opinions
- Alan v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
- Carmel, Ltd. v. TavoussiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Monarch Healthcare v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Sunset Millennium Associates, LLC v. Le Songe, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Bi-Coastal Payroll Services, Inc. v. California Insurance Guarantee Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.