Legal Opinion

20th Century Insurance v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 21, 1994No. B085339PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EPSTEIN, Acting P. J.

We granted an alternative writ of mandate in this case to decide a single issue: the validity of the policy of the Los Angeles Superior Court Appellate Department that the time to file a notice of appeal runs from the date the clerk mails a notice of ruling. We conclude the policy is invalid because it conflicts with California Rules of Court, rule 122, which governs the subject. Under that provision, the 30-day time period runs from a clerk’s notice of entry of an appealable order. Relying on its policy, the appellate department dismissed the petitioners’ appeal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hollister Convalescent Hospital, Inc. v. RicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Reygoza v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Hughey v. City of HaywardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. People v. Wilshire Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Alan v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Carmel, Ltd. v. TavoussiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Monarch Healthcare v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Sunset Millennium Associates, LLC v. Le Songe, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Bi-Coastal Payroll Services, Inc. v. California Insurance Guarantee Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API