Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Steinmaus

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 7, 1986No. C1-86-554PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

This appeal is from an order denying appellants’ motion for a new trial. Appellants claim the trial court erred in failing to grant them a jury trial. We reverse.

FACTS

The underlying action for a recovery of money was venued in Ramsey County. Respondent’s attorney apparently filed a court note of issue in Ramsey County but served appellants the note of issue designating venue in Washington County. Appellants’ counsel then served and filed a jury note of issue also designating venue in Washington County.

At the pre-trial chambers hearing, a record was made regarding…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marriage of Carlson v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Weber Electric Company v. Tuminelly, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schweich v. Ziegler, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Schweich v. Ziegler, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API