Legal Opinion

Crosby v. Glick

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 5, 1926PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

This cause comes into this court on appeal from the court of common pleas of this county. The plaintiff brought an action in ejectment to recover possession of the premises described in the petition. The defendant, by way of cross-petition, asked for specific performance of a contract for the purchase of such premises. Upon hearing the court below; found that the plaintiff was not entitled to the possession of the premises, but gave the defendant the relief asked for in his cross-petition, by decreeing specific performance of the land contract upon payment by the defendant of the balance of…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lund v. LarsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  2. O'Neill v. GermanOhio Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API