Perkins v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MORROW, Presiding Judge.
In the motion for. rehearing it is vigorously insisted that the evidence is insufficient to warrant the conviction.
According to her testimony, the prosecutrix, appellant and his wife, went to a lake. After remaining there for a short time, the appellant’s wife walked to town. During her absence, the prosecutrix claims that she was subjected to two attacks by the appellant in each of which he had intercourse with her by force and against her will and consent.' She claims in her testimony to have resisted him by pushing, striking and slapping him. It appears from her…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Price v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Lusty v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Venable v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Stevens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Duty v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
3Cited by3 opinions
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Gray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941