Legal Opinion

Messinger v. Antokolitz

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided December 15, 1911PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion to set aside a verdict and for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtFinelite, J.

The jury rendered its verdict in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $730, whereupon the defendants immediately moved to set it aside on all the grounds stated in section 999 of the Code of Civil Procedure. This motion the court entertained. It appears from the facts herein that on January 10, 1911, the defendants induced the plaintiff to purchase a certificate of stock of the Strictly Jewish Bologna Company, a corporation doing business in the city of Hew York; that certain representations were made by the defend-• ants at the time said plaintiff paid his money for the pur*589chase of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. Columbia Common PleasNew York Supreme Court · 1828
  2. Layman v. John Anderson & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  3. Ex parte CaykendollNew York Supreme Court · 1826
  4. von der Born v. SchultzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  5. Moses v. Central Park, North & East River RailroadNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. DresslerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
  2. United States v. DresslerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API