Legal Opinion

Toth v. Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 8, 1933No. Appeal 33PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

The sole question raised in this appeal is whether the injured employee should be compensated pursuant to the provisions of Section 306 (a) of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, as the court held, or in accordance with the provisions of Section 306 (c), as contended by the appellant.

The claimant, on February 10, 1928, sustained an injury. Compensation was awarded, to continue as long as his disability should exist, within the limitations of the act. On February 13, 1932, the appellant filed a petition for termination or modification of the award, setting forth that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lente v. LuciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Clark v. Clearfield Opera House Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. O'Donnell v. S. Fayette Twp. School DistrictSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Yanik v. Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Spina v. Galiagan Construction Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Mancini v. Pennsylvania Rubber Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Zuro v. McClintic Marshall Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Cole v. StewartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API