Legal Opinion
State v. Woodsum
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided May 14, 1993No. 91-465PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
A jury in Superior Court (Dalianis, J.) -found the defendant, Robert Woodsum, guilty on two counts of felonious sexual assault, for having had sexual contact twice with a female victim under the age of thirteen. See RSA 632-A:3, III (1986). On appeal, the defendant argues that the trial court’s exclusion from the evidence of his rejection of a lenient plea offer violated New Hampshire Rules of Evidence 408 and 410 and his right under part I, article 15 of our State Constitution to present all favorable proofs. We affirm.
*199The defendant’s conviction was based on evidence that he had sexual…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Andrew Jackson RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Mario Biaggi, Stanley Simon, Richard Biaggi, Peter Neglia, John Mariotta, and Bernard EhrlichCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Maynard John VerdoornCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Patrick Joseph GreeneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. SeymourSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
- Wolterbeek's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- State v. HastingsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- State v. OrjiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- In Re the Reinstatement of McConnelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.