Legal Opinion
Orange & Rockland Utilities, Inc. v. Amerada Hess Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 17, 1971PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMorrie Slifkin, J.
Plaintiff moves by an order to show canse for a preliminary injunction. Defendant cross-moves to vacate an ex parte temporary restraining order contained in said order to show cause and for related relief.
The sole issue to be considered by the court at this juncture is whether plaintiff is entitled to a preliminary injunction enjoining defendant’s threatened violation of the contract between the parties and requiring defendant to perform its terms and conditions pending the final determination of this lawsuit.
*561On oral argument, the Public Service Commission of the State of New York was granted…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- International Railway Co. v. BaroneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- Republic Aviation Corp. v. Republic Lodge No. 1987New York Supreme Court · 1957
- Columbia Gas of New York, Inc. v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1968
- Ming v. SimpkinsNew York Supreme Court · 1968
- Westbury Electronic Corp. v. Anglo-American Totalisator Co.New York Supreme Court · 1967
3Cited by2 opinions
- Town of Hempstead v. StateNew York Supreme Court · 2005
- Shubin v. Slate Digital, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2022