Legal Opinion

Vincent v. Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 29, 1943No. Appeals, 179 and 199PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Horace Stern,

This appeal of the City of Philadelphia is directed to the excessiveness of the verdicts. The action was to recover damages resulting from the death of a minor child. In order to reach a proper legal result in such cases it must steadfastly be borne in mind that the law is concerned only with the economic and not the human value of the life that has been taken; it does not attempt to measure in money the parental anguish caused by a child’s death.

The victim of the accident was a six-year-old girl who was struck and almost instantly killed by a city truck.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pezzulli v. D'AmbrosiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Givens v. W. J. Gilmore Drug Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Amadio v. LevinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Frankel v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Patton v. Baltimore & O. R. Co. (Duquesne Slag Products Co., Third Party Defendant) (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
  4. Rohlfing v. Moses Akiona, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Fabel, Admr. v. HazlettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API