Legal Opinion

Hoo v. Uribe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 9, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated January 22, 1997, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, on the ground that the plaintiff did not suffer a serious injury as defined by Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the defendant’s motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.

As conceded by the respondent, the Supreme Court incorrectly characterized the document submitted by the plaintiffs…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rut v. GrigonisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Gant v. SparacinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Rodriguez v. ChinatombyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. Russo v. SchererAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rum v. Pam Transport, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Manzanares v. AlievAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API