Wicks-Nease v. James
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from the District Court of Bexar. Tried below before Hon. S. J. Brooks.
1Opinion of the Court
ELY, Associate Justice.
This is a suit .to recover attorney’s fees alleged to be due appellants on two promissory notes, one for $18,000 and the other for $7000, the attorney’s fees being for 10 per cent on those two sums. The case was tried by the court, and resulted in a judgment for appellee.
The evidence showed that James P. Hickman had, in 1892, executed a note to E. D. L. Wickes for the sum of $18,000, and in 1893 executed to Mrs. E. A. T. Mease (then Wickes) a note for $7000, each of said notes providing for interest and attorney’s fees. This language was used in the first named note:…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Laning v. Iron City National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1896
- Stansell & Younger v. ClevelandTexas Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stadelman v. MinerOregon Supreme Court · 1916
- In re Estate of MurphyTuscarawas County Probate Court · 1932
- Sampeck v. StrongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971