Legal Opinion

Wicks-Nease v. James

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 7, 1903PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Bexar. Tried below before Hon. S. J. Brooks.

1Opinion of the Court

ELY, Associate Justice.

This is a suit .to recover attorney’s fees alleged to be due appellants on two promissory notes, one for $18,000 and the other for $7000, the attorney’s fees being for 10 per cent on those two sums. The case was tried by the court, and resulted in a judgment for appellee.

The evidence showed that James P. Hickman had, in 1892, executed a note to E. D. L. Wickes for the sum of $18,000, and in 1893 executed to Mrs. E. A. T. Mease (then Wickes) a note for $7000, each of said notes providing for interest and attorney’s fees. This language was used in the first named note:…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Laning v. Iron City National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Stansell & Younger v. ClevelandTexas Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stadelman v. MinerOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  2. In re Estate of MurphyTuscarawas County Probate Court · 1932
  3. Sampeck v. StrongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API