Legal Opinion
John Teixeira v. County of Alameda
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 16, 2016No. 13-17132PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge O’SCANNLAIN; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge SILVERMAN.
OPINION
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
We must decide whether the right to keep and to bear arms, as recognized by the Second Amendment, necessarily includes the right of law-abiding Americans to purchase and to sell firearms. In other words, we must determine whether the Second Amendment places any limits on regulating the commercial sale of firearms.
I
A
In the fall of 2010, John Teixeira, Steve Nobriga, and Gary Gamaza decided to open a retail business that would offer firearm training, provide gun-smith ser*1050vic…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. MarzzarellaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Espanola Jackson v. City and County of San FrancisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Samuel HosfordCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Victor TorresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Herndon v. City of SandpointIdaho Supreme Court · 2023
- Bezet v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2017
- John Teixeira v. County of AlamedaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.