Legal Opinion
Margaret Ressler, Plaintiffs/appellees/cross-Appellants v. Samuel R. Pierce, Jr., Defendants/appellants/cross-Appellees
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 2, 1982No. 81-3294, 81-3404PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:
This is a class action against the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) and the owners of certain subsidized housing in Alaska. Plaintiffs are applicants and potential applicants for HUD rent subsidies under the Section 8 Set-Aside Program, 42 U.S.C. § 1437f (1978 & Supp. 1982), of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (“the Section 8 program”). Plaintiffs allege that they were denied due process and equal protection by the manner in which the owners of a subsidized apartment complex processed their applications for rent subsidies.
These are…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Walters v. National Assn. of Radiation SurvivorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Thurber v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1993
- Emma Powderly v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, and Donald T. Regan, Secretary of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Cushman v. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Lila M. Mallette v. Arlington County Employees' Supplemental Retirement System II Arlington County Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.