Legal Opinion · Dissent

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Commissioner of Taxation & Finance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 4, 1993Published

1Dissent

Casey, J. (dissenting).

The majority holds that no contract existed until the required shareholder approval was obtained. Judicial review of an administrative determination, however, is limited to the grounds invoked by the agency (Matter of Scherbyn v Wayne-Finger Lakes Bd. of Coop. Educ. Servs., 77 NY2d 753, 758), and the determination of respondent Tax Appeals Tribunal expressly recognized that "[t]he merger agreement may have been a contract”. In any event, there is no support in the record for the majority’s conclusion that shareholder approval of the merger was the sine qua non of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Merritt Hill Vineyards Inc. v. Windy Heights Vineyard, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Scherbyn v. Wayne-Finger Lakes Board of Cooperative Educational ServicesNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co. v. Malan Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Vast Goed v. Tax CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. Matco Electric Co. v. American District Telegraph Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API