Legal Opinion

Slayton v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 3, 1976No. 1 CA-IC 1410PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NELSON, Judge.

This petition involves a claim for workmen’s compensation benefits based upon the aggravation of an underlying and preexisting skin condition known as exfolia-tive erythrodermatitis. Jerry Slayton (Slayton), the petitioner herein, was employed by the respondent employer, Station KRUX (KRUX), as an advertisement salesman from January 6, 1974 through June 4, 1974, when he was hospitalized by Peter Lynch, M.D., a dermatologist in Tucson.

On September 3, 1974, Slayton filed a claim for workmen’s compensation benefits for an alleged injury by accident arising out of and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Murray v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Micucci v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Matter of MitchellArizona Supreme Court · 1944
  4. English v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Paulley v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1962

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. American Ins. Co. v. Indus. Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  2. American Insurance v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API